<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CitiesGoGreen &#187; building codes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citiesgogreen.com/category/building-codes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citiesgogreen.com</link>
	<description>Sustainability for people in local government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sustainable City rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.citiesgogreen.com/2009/08/17/sustainable-city-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citiesgogreen.com/2009/08/17/sustainable-city-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citiesgogreen.com/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To learn how your city compares to other cities your size check out Smarter Cities , a project of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The mission of Smarter Cities is to nudge cities towards friendly competition about sustainability. The website has a wealth of information about best practices and ideas cities are employing to become greener. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To learn how your city compares to other cities your size check out <a title="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/large" href="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/large" target="_blank">Smarter Cities </a>, a project of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The mission of Smarter Cities is to nudge cities towards friendly competition about sustainability. The website has a wealth of information about best practices and ideas cities are employing to become greener. You can even take a <a title="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/large" href="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/large" target="_blank">quiz</a> to see how city smart you are about urban rehabilitation, sprawl, green space, green building, renewable energy, energy conservation, water, transportation, food, recycling and air.<br />
<span id="more-694"></span><br />
Cities fall into three population categories, small cities with populations from 50,000 to 99,999 people (408 cities), medium cities with populations from 100,000 to 249,999 (178 cities) and large cities with populations of 250,000 and over (67 cities).</p>
<p>The rankings here are especially useful because they explain the <a title="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/scoring-criteria" href="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/scoring-criteria" target="_blank">criteria</a> used and the method of scoring: air quality, energy production and conservation, environmental standards and participation, green building, green space, recycling, transportation, standard of living, and water quality and conservation.</p>
<p>Cities are rated for each criterion and the 15 top ranked cities for all categories are highlighted in each group. Seattle, Washington is the top <a title="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/large" href="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/large" target="_blank">large</a> city. Madison, Wisconsin is the top <a title="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/medium" href="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/medium" target="_blank">medium</a> city. Bellingham, Washington is the top <a title="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/small" href="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/small" target="_blank">small</a> city.</p>
<p>In addition, there is ranking for each criterion. For example, in the small <a title="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/small" href="http://smartercities.nrdc.org/rankings/small" target="_blank">city category</a> Bellingham has the cumulative top ranking and individual top ranking in air quality and green space. Mountain View, California, is ranked highest for transportation, energy production and conservation, and water quality. Petaluma, California is ranked top in standard of living. Beaverton, Oregon is rated highest for green building. Fayetteville, Arkansas is ranked top for environmental standards and participation. Mission Viejo, California is ranked highest for recycling.</p>
<p>You can add your city if it is not already included in the database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citiesgogreen.com/2009/08/17/sustainable-city-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World&#039;s Greatest Threat: Sprawl</title>
		<link>http://www.citiesgogreen.com/2009/05/20/worlds-greatest-threat-sprawl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citiesgogreen.com/2009/05/20/worlds-greatest-threat-sprawl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daimon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable cities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citiesgogreen.com/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) sponsored a video contest and the clever+profound winner is Built to Last 
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGJt_YXIoJI&#38;feature=player_embedded]

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="Congress for the New Urbanism" href="http://www.cnu.org/node/2853" target="_blank">Congress for the New Urbanism</a> (CNU) sponsored a video contest and the clever+profound winner is <em>Built to Last </em></p>
<p><em>[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGJt_YXIoJI&amp;feature=player_embedded]<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citiesgogreen.com/2009/05/20/worlds-greatest-threat-sprawl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Spectrum of High Performance Buildings</title>
		<link>http://www.citiesgogreen.com/2009/04/08/the-spectrum-of-high-performance-buildings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citiesgogreen.com/2009/04/08/the-spectrum-of-high-performance-buildings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daimon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Buildings Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citiesgogreen.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;As large property owners and civic leaders, cities are in a unique position to make something happen in high performance buildings,&#8221; said Dave Hewitt, executive director at New Buildings Institute (NBI). &#8220;And many of them already have or are getting ready to.&#8221;
Buildings are responsible for about two thirds of U.S. electrical consumption and nearly half [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://content.yudu.com/Library/A16ahz/TheSpectrumofHighPer/resources/index.htm"><img class="size-full wp-image-168 alignleft" style="border:1px solid black;margin:5px 10px;" title="The Spectrum of Hight Performance Buildings" src="http://citiesgogreen.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/spectrumhighperformancebldgs-1.jpg" alt="The Spectrum of High Performance Buildings" width="200" height="244" /></a></p>
<p>&#8220;As large property owners and civic leaders, cities are in a unique position to make something happen in high performance buildings,&#8221; said Dave Hewitt, executive director at <a title="New Buildings Institute" href="http://www.newbuildings.org/">New Buildings Institute</a> (NBI). &#8220;And many of them already have or are getting ready to.&#8221;</p>
<p>Buildings are responsible for about two thirds of U.S. electrical consumption and nearly half of the country&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions. Fewer than one in 1000 new buildings meet readily achievable high performance standards. Cities and counties wanting to go green can take a good look at their policies related to commercial buildings and start improving this score by understanding the high performance building continuum.</p>
<p>Read the whole article: <a title="The Spectrum of High Performance Buildings" href="http://content.yudu.com/Library/A16ahz/TheSpectrumofHighPer/resources/index.htm"> The Spectrum of High Performance Buildings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citiesgogreen.com/2009/04/08/the-spectrum-of-high-performance-buildings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
