Posted by
For those who see a bright green future, here’s evidence it makes sense. The jobs aspect ought to be interesting for local communities, not to mention the long term benefits.
Greenpeace and the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC) commissioned a study from the German Aerospace Center. Based on that study, Greenpeace is putting forth the Energy [R]evolution U.S. Scenario, a blueprint for how the U.S. can use energy more efficiently and increase renewable energy generating capacity to cut current CO2 emissions levels some 23% by 2020 and 85% by 2050.
Here’s the press release with an overview of the bottom line elements. Keep reading for another overview:
The German Aerospace Center summary says:
- A sustainable energy supply can be achieved, even under conditions of global economic growth – this is the outcome of the updated global energy scenario developed on behalf of Greenpeace International and the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC) by the Institute of Technical Thermodynamics (Institut für Technische Thermodynamik) of DLR in cooperation with over 30 other scientists and institutes.
The report states, “According to the University of Massachusetts’s Political Economy Research Institute, investments in wind and solar power create 2.8 times as many jobs as the same investment in coal; mass transit and conservation would create 3.8 times as many jobs as coal.” We project that the Energy [R]evolution Scenario would create 14.5 million more new jobs by 2050 than would be created by meeting our energy needs with continued dependence on fossil fuels.
The U.S. could incur as much as $271 billion in expenses by 2025 from the impacts of just four consequences of unchecked global warming: hurricane damage as storms become more powerful and more frequent, severe water shortages, higher energy costs, and real estate losses from rising sea levels.
The Energy [R]evolution report proposes that we can solve global warming and create millions of new jobs plus secure our energy future without being subject to the volatility of energy prices due to the fluctuating costs of imported fuels.
Several considerations are addressed:
“What this report shows is that doing what science says is necessary won’t just provide the planet a living future, it actually will create far more jobs and save far more money than business as usual,” says Greenpeace global warming campaign director Steven Biel. “And it will do it without exposing us to the unnecessary risks and pointless boondoggles that would come with any further investments in nuclear or coal.”